Skill 寫法圖鑑

swift-actor-persistence

affaan-m | 架構與重構 | 原文 | MIT

用 Swift actor 做執行緒安全的快取加檔案持久化

中文翻譯

---
name: swift-actor-persistence
description: 在 Swift 裡用 actor 做執行緒安全的資料持久化:以檔案為底的記憶體快取,從設計上消除資料競爭。在 Swift 裡持久化資料,而且需要從設計上排除資料競爭或執行緒安全問題時使用。
metadata:
  origin: ECC
---

# 用 Swift Actor 做執行緒安全的持久化

用 Swift actor 打造執行緒安全資料持久層的模式。結合記憶體快取與檔案儲存,利用 actor 模型在編譯期消除資料競爭。

## 何時啟用

- 在 Swift 5.5+ 中建構資料持久層
- 需要以執行緒安全的方式存取共享的可變狀態
- 想消除手動同步(lock、DispatchQueue)
- 建構採用本地儲存的 offline-first 應用程式

## 核心模式

### 以 Actor 為基礎的 Repository

Actor 模型保證序列化存取,沒有資料競爭,由編譯器強制執行。

```swift
public actor LocalRepository<T: Codable & Identifiable> where T.ID == String {
    private var cache: [String: T] = [:]
    private let fileURL: URL

    public init(directory: URL = .documentsDirectory, filename: String = "data.json") {
        self.fileURL = directory.appendingPathComponent(filename)
        // Synchronous load during init (actor isolation not yet active)
        self.cache = Self.loadSynchronously(from: fileURL)
    }

    // MARK: - Public API

    public func save(_ item: T) throws {
        cache[item.id] = item
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func delete(_ id: String) throws {
        cache[id] = nil
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func find(by id: String) -> T? {
        cache[id]
    }

    public func loadAll() -> [T] {
        Array(cache.values)
    }

    // MARK: - Private

    private func persistToFile() throws {
        let data = try JSONEncoder().encode(Array(cache.values))
        try data.write(to: fileURL, options: .atomic)
    }

    private static func loadSynchronously(from url: URL) -> [String: T] {
        guard let data = try? Data(contentsOf: url),
              let items = try? JSONDecoder().decode([T].self, from: data) else {
            return [:]
        }
        return Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: items.map { ($0.id, $0) })
    }
}
```

### 使用方式

因為 actor 隔離,所有呼叫都會自動變成 async:

```swift
let repository = LocalRepository<Question>()

// Read — fast O(1) lookup from in-memory cache
let question = await repository.find(by: "q-001")
let allQuestions = await repository.loadAll()

// Write — updates cache and persists to file atomically
try await repository.save(newQuestion)
try await repository.delete("q-001")
```

### 搭配 @Observable ViewModel

```swift
@Observable
final class QuestionListViewModel {
    private(set) var questions: [Question] = []
    private let repository: LocalRepository<Question>

    init(repository: LocalRepository<Question> = LocalRepository()) {
        self.repository = repository
    }

    func load() async {
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }

    func add(_ question: Question) async throws {
        try await repository.save(question)
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }
}
```

## 關鍵設計決策

| 決策 | 理由 |
|----------|-----------|
| 用 Actor(不是 class + lock) | 由編譯器強制執行緒安全,不需要手動同步 |
| 記憶體快取 + 檔案持久化 | 從快取快速讀取,寫入磁碟確保持久 |
| 同步載入的 init | 避開非同步初始化的複雜度 |
| 以 ID 為 key 的 Dictionary | 以識別碼做 O(1) 查找 |
| 對 `Codable & Identifiable` 泛型化 | 可重複用於任何模型型別 |
| 原子檔案寫入(`.atomic`) | 避免當機時只寫入一半 |

## 最佳實務

- 所有跨越 actor 邊界的資料都**使用 `Sendable` 型別**
- **讓 actor 的公開 API 保持最小**:只公開領域操作,不要公開持久化細節
- **用 `.atomic` 寫入**,避免 app 在寫入中途當機造成資料損毀
- **在 `init` 裡同步載入**:對本地檔案來說,async 初始化只增加複雜度,好處很小
- **搭配 `@Observable`** ViewModel,做回應式的 UI 更新

## 要避免的反模式

- 新的 Swift concurrency 程式碼,卻用 `DispatchQueue` 或 `NSLock` 取代 actor
- 把內部的快取 dictionary 暴露給外部呼叫者
- 讓檔案 URL 可設定,卻沒有驗證
- 忘了所有 actor 方法呼叫都是 `await`:呼叫者必須處理 async context
- 用 `nonisolated` 繞過 actor 隔離(這就失去了意義)

## 何時使用

- iOS/macOS app 的本地資料儲存(使用者資料、設定、快取內容)
- 之後才同步到伺服器的 offline-first 架構
- app 中多個部分並行存取的任何共享可變狀態
- 把舊式以 `DispatchQueue` 為基礎的執行緒安全,換成現代的 Swift concurrency

英文原文

---
name: swift-actor-persistence
description: Thread-safe data persistence in Swift using actors — in-memory cache with file-backed storage, eliminating data races by design. Use when persisting data in Swift and a data race or thread-safety problem needs designing out.
metadata:
  origin: ECC
---

# Swift Actors for Thread-Safe Persistence

Patterns for building thread-safe data persistence layers using Swift actors. Combines in-memory caching with file-backed storage, leveraging the actor model to eliminate data races at compile time.

## When to Activate

- Building a data persistence layer in Swift 5.5+
- Need thread-safe access to shared mutable state
- Want to eliminate manual synchronization (locks, DispatchQueues)
- Building offline-first apps with local storage

## Core Pattern

### Actor-Based Repository

The actor model guarantees serialized access — no data races, enforced by the compiler.

```swift
public actor LocalRepository<T: Codable & Identifiable> where T.ID == String {
    private var cache: [String: T] = [:]
    private let fileURL: URL

    public init(directory: URL = .documentsDirectory, filename: String = "data.json") {
        self.fileURL = directory.appendingPathComponent(filename)
        // Synchronous load during init (actor isolation not yet active)
        self.cache = Self.loadSynchronously(from: fileURL)
    }

    // MARK: - Public API

    public func save(_ item: T) throws {
        cache[item.id] = item
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func delete(_ id: String) throws {
        cache[id] = nil
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func find(by id: String) -> T? {
        cache[id]
    }

    public func loadAll() -> [T] {
        Array(cache.values)
    }

    // MARK: - Private

    private func persistToFile() throws {
        let data = try JSONEncoder().encode(Array(cache.values))
        try data.write(to: fileURL, options: .atomic)
    }

    private static func loadSynchronously(from url: URL) -> [String: T] {
        guard let data = try? Data(contentsOf: url),
              let items = try? JSONDecoder().decode([T].self, from: data) else {
            return [:]
        }
        return Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: items.map { ($0.id, $0) })
    }
}
```

### Usage

All calls are automatically async due to actor isolation:

```swift
let repository = LocalRepository<Question>()

// Read — fast O(1) lookup from in-memory cache
let question = await repository.find(by: "q-001")
let allQuestions = await repository.loadAll()

// Write — updates cache and persists to file atomically
try await repository.save(newQuestion)
try await repository.delete("q-001")
```

### Combining with @Observable ViewModel

```swift
@Observable
final class QuestionListViewModel {
    private(set) var questions: [Question] = []
    private let repository: LocalRepository<Question>

    init(repository: LocalRepository<Question> = LocalRepository()) {
        self.repository = repository
    }

    func load() async {
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }

    func add(_ question: Question) async throws {
        try await repository.save(question)
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }
}
```

## Key Design Decisions

| Decision | Rationale |
|----------|-----------|
| Actor (not class + lock) | Compiler-enforced thread safety, no manual synchronization |
| In-memory cache + file persistence | Fast reads from cache, durable writes to disk |
| Synchronous init loading | Avoids async initialization complexity |
| Dictionary keyed by ID | O(1) lookups by identifier |
| Generic over `Codable & Identifiable` | Reusable across any model type |
| Atomic file writes (`.atomic`) | Prevents partial writes on crash |

## Best Practices

- **Use `Sendable` types** for all data crossing actor boundaries
- **Keep the actor's public API minimal** — only expose domain operations, not persistence details
- **Use `.atomic` writes** to prevent data corruption if the app crashes mid-write
- **Load synchronously in `init`** — async initializers add complexity with minimal benefit for local files
- **Combine with `@Observable`** ViewModels for reactive UI updates

## Anti-Patterns to Avoid

- Using `DispatchQueue` or `NSLock` instead of actors for new Swift concurrency code
- Exposing the internal cache dictionary to external callers
- Making the file URL configurable without validation
- Forgetting that all actor method calls are `await` — callers must handle async context
- Using `nonisolated` to bypass actor isolation (defeats the purpose)

## When to Use

- Local data storage in iOS/macOS apps (user data, settings, cached content)
- Offline-first architectures that sync to a server later
- Any shared mutable state that multiple parts of the app access concurrently
- Replacing legacy `DispatchQueue`-based thread safety with modern Swift concurrency