swift-protocol-di-testing
用小而聚焦的 protocol 注入相依項,讓 Swift 程式碼好測試
中文翻譯
---
name: swift-protocol-di-testing
description: 以 protocol 為基礎的依賴注入,讓 Swift 程式碼可測試:用聚焦的 protocol 和 Swift Testing 來 mock 檔案系統、網路和外部 API。Swift 程式碼需要測試,而且檔案系統、網路或外部 API 必須被 mock 時使用。
metadata:
origin: ECC
---
# 用 Swift Protocol 依賴注入做測試
把外部相依項(檔案系統、網路、iCloud)抽象到小而聚焦的 protocol 後面,讓 Swift 程式碼可以測試的模式。讓測試不用 I/O 也能保持確定性。
## 何時啟用
- 撰寫會存取檔案系統、網路或外部 API 的 Swift 程式碼
- 需要測試錯誤處理路徑,又不想觸發真正的失敗
- 建構要能跨環境運作的模組(app、測試、SwiftUI preview)
- 搭配 Swift concurrency(actor、Sendable)設計可測試的架構
## 核心模式
### 1. 定義小而聚焦的 Protocol
每個 protocol 只處理一個外部關注點。
```swift
// File system access
public protocol FileSystemProviding: Sendable {
func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL?
}
// File read/write operations
public protocol FileAccessorProviding: Sendable {
func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data
func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws
func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool
}
// Bookmark storage (e.g., for sandboxed apps)
public protocol BookmarkStorageProviding: Sendable {
func saveBookmark(_ data: Data, for key: String) throws
func loadBookmark(for key: String) throws -> Data?
}
```
### 2. 建立預設(正式環境)實作
```swift
public struct DefaultFileSystemProvider: FileSystemProviding {
public init() {}
public func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL? {
FileManager.default.url(forUbiquityContainerIdentifier: nil)
}
}
public struct DefaultFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding {
public init() {}
public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
try Data(contentsOf: url)
}
public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
try data.write(to: url, options: .atomic)
}
public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: url.path)
}
}
```
### 3. 建立測試用的 Mock 實作
```swift
public final class MockFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding, @unchecked Sendable {
public var files: [URL: Data] = [:]
public var readError: Error?
public var writeError: Error?
public init() {}
public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
if let error = readError { throw error }
guard let data = files[url] else {
throw CocoaError(.fileReadNoSuchFile)
}
return data
}
public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
if let error = writeError { throw error }
files[url] = data
}
public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
files[url] != nil
}
}
```
### 4. 用預設參數注入相依項
正式環境的程式碼用預設值;測試則注入 mock。
```swift
public actor SyncManager {
private let fileSystem: FileSystemProviding
private let fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding
public init(
fileSystem: FileSystemProviding = DefaultFileSystemProvider(),
fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding = DefaultFileAccessor()
) {
self.fileSystem = fileSystem
self.fileAccessor = fileAccessor
}
public func sync() async throws {
guard let containerURL = fileSystem.containerURL(for: .sync) else {
throw SyncError.containerNotAvailable
}
let data = try fileAccessor.read(
from: containerURL.appendingPathComponent("data.json")
)
// Process data...
}
}
```
### 5. 用 Swift Testing 寫測試
```swift
import Testing
@Test("Sync manager handles missing container")
func testMissingContainer() async {
let mockFileSystem = MockFileSystemProvider(containerURL: nil)
let manager = SyncManager(fileSystem: mockFileSystem)
await #expect(throws: SyncError.containerNotAvailable) {
try await manager.sync()
}
}
@Test("Sync manager reads data correctly")
func testReadData() async throws {
let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
mockFileAccessor.files[testURL] = testData
let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
let result = try await manager.loadData()
#expect(result == expectedData)
}
@Test("Sync manager handles read errors gracefully")
func testReadError() async {
let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
mockFileAccessor.readError = CocoaError(.fileReadCorruptFile)
let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
await #expect(throws: SyncError.self) {
try await manager.sync()
}
}
```
## 最佳實務
- **單一職責**:每個 protocol 只處理一個關注點,不要建立方法一大堆的「上帝 protocol」
- **Sendable conformance**:protocol 跨 actor 邊界使用時必須有
- **預設參數**:讓正式環境的程式碼預設使用真實實作;只有測試需要指定 mock
- **錯誤模擬**:設計 mock 時,要有可設定的錯誤屬性,用來測試失敗路徑
- **只 mock 邊界**:mock 外部相依項(檔案系統、網路、API),不要 mock 內部型別
## 要避免的反模式
- 建立涵蓋所有外部存取的單一巨大 protocol
- Mock 沒有外部相依項的內部型別
- 用 `#if DEBUG` 條件編譯,取代正確的依賴注入
- 搭配 actor 使用時,忘了 `Sendable` conformance
- 過度設計:如果某個型別沒有外部相依項,就不需要 protocol
## 何時使用
- 任何會碰到檔案系統、網路或外部 API 的 Swift 程式碼
- 測試在真實環境很難觸發的錯誤處理路徑
- 建構需要在 app、測試和 SwiftUI preview 情境下都能運作的模組
- 使用 Swift concurrency(actor、結構化並行)、需要可測試架構的 app英文原文
---
name: swift-protocol-di-testing
description: Protocol-based dependency injection for testable Swift code — mock file system, network, and external APIs using focused protocols and Swift Testing. Use when Swift code needs testing and file system, network, or external APIs must be mocked.
metadata:
origin: ECC
---
# Swift Protocol-Based Dependency Injection for Testing
Patterns for making Swift code testable by abstracting external dependencies (file system, network, iCloud) behind small, focused protocols. Enables deterministic tests without I/O.
## When to Activate
- Writing Swift code that accesses file system, network, or external APIs
- Need to test error handling paths without triggering real failures
- Building modules that work across environments (app, test, SwiftUI preview)
- Designing testable architecture with Swift concurrency (actors, Sendable)
## Core Pattern
### 1. Define Small, Focused Protocols
Each protocol handles exactly one external concern.
```swift
// File system access
public protocol FileSystemProviding: Sendable {
func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL?
}
// File read/write operations
public protocol FileAccessorProviding: Sendable {
func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data
func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws
func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool
}
// Bookmark storage (e.g., for sandboxed apps)
public protocol BookmarkStorageProviding: Sendable {
func saveBookmark(_ data: Data, for key: String) throws
func loadBookmark(for key: String) throws -> Data?
}
```
### 2. Create Default (Production) Implementations
```swift
public struct DefaultFileSystemProvider: FileSystemProviding {
public init() {}
public func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL? {
FileManager.default.url(forUbiquityContainerIdentifier: nil)
}
}
public struct DefaultFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding {
public init() {}
public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
try Data(contentsOf: url)
}
public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
try data.write(to: url, options: .atomic)
}
public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: url.path)
}
}
```
### 3. Create Mock Implementations for Testing
```swift
public final class MockFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding, @unchecked Sendable {
public var files: [URL: Data] = [:]
public var readError: Error?
public var writeError: Error?
public init() {}
public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
if let error = readError { throw error }
guard let data = files[url] else {
throw CocoaError(.fileReadNoSuchFile)
}
return data
}
public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
if let error = writeError { throw error }
files[url] = data
}
public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
files[url] != nil
}
}
```
### 4. Inject Dependencies with Default Parameters
Production code uses defaults; tests inject mocks.
```swift
public actor SyncManager {
private let fileSystem: FileSystemProviding
private let fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding
public init(
fileSystem: FileSystemProviding = DefaultFileSystemProvider(),
fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding = DefaultFileAccessor()
) {
self.fileSystem = fileSystem
self.fileAccessor = fileAccessor
}
public func sync() async throws {
guard let containerURL = fileSystem.containerURL(for: .sync) else {
throw SyncError.containerNotAvailable
}
let data = try fileAccessor.read(
from: containerURL.appendingPathComponent("data.json")
)
// Process data...
}
}
```
### 5. Write Tests with Swift Testing
```swift
import Testing
@Test("Sync manager handles missing container")
func testMissingContainer() async {
let mockFileSystem = MockFileSystemProvider(containerURL: nil)
let manager = SyncManager(fileSystem: mockFileSystem)
await #expect(throws: SyncError.containerNotAvailable) {
try await manager.sync()
}
}
@Test("Sync manager reads data correctly")
func testReadData() async throws {
let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
mockFileAccessor.files[testURL] = testData
let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
let result = try await manager.loadData()
#expect(result == expectedData)
}
@Test("Sync manager handles read errors gracefully")
func testReadError() async {
let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
mockFileAccessor.readError = CocoaError(.fileReadCorruptFile)
let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
await #expect(throws: SyncError.self) {
try await manager.sync()
}
}
```
## Best Practices
- **Single Responsibility**: Each protocol should handle one concern — don't create "god protocols" with many methods
- **Sendable conformance**: Required when protocols are used across actor boundaries
- **Default parameters**: Let production code use real implementations by default; only tests need to specify mocks
- **Error simulation**: Design mocks with configurable error properties for testing failure paths
- **Only mock boundaries**: Mock external dependencies (file system, network, APIs), not internal types
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Creating a single large protocol that covers all external access
- Mocking internal types that have no external dependencies
- Using `#if DEBUG` conditionals instead of proper dependency injection
- Forgetting `Sendable` conformance when used with actors
- Over-engineering: if a type has no external dependencies, it doesn't need a protocol
## When to Use
- Any Swift code that touches file system, network, or external APIs
- Testing error handling paths that are hard to trigger in real environments
- Building modules that need to work in app, test, and SwiftUI preview contexts
- Apps using Swift concurrency (actors, structured concurrency) that need testable architecture