vendor-review
評估供應商的總成本、風險與表現，給出採購建議
中文翻譯
--- name: vendor-review description: 評估供應商：成本分析、風險評估和建議。在審閱新供應商的提案、決定要續約還是換掉合約、並排比較兩家供應商，或在採購簽核前建立 TCO 拆解和談判要點時使用。 argument-hint: "<供應商名稱或提案>" --- # /vendor-review > 如果看到不認識的 placeholder，或想確認目前連了哪些工具，請看 [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md)。 用結構化分析評估供應商，涵蓋成本、風險、表現和契合度。 ## 用法 ``` /vendor-review $ARGUMENTS ``` ## 我需要你提供什麼 - **供應商名稱**：你在評估誰？ - **情境**：新供應商評估、續約決策，還是比較？ - **細節**：合約條款、定價、提案文件，或目前的表現資料 ## 評估框架 ### 成本分析（總擁有成本） - 總擁有成本（不只是授權費） - 導入和遷移成本 - 訓練和 onboarding 成本 - 持續的支援與維護 - 退出成本（資料遷移、合約終止） ### 風險評估 - 供應商的財務穩定性 - 資安與合規狀況 - 集中風險（依賴單一供應商） - 合約綁定與退出條款 - 業務持續運作與災難復原 ### 績效指標 - SLA 遵守狀況 - 支援回應時間 - 運作時間與可靠度 - 功能交付節奏 - 客戶滿意度 ### 比較矩陣 比較供應商時，產出並排矩陣，涵蓋：定價、功能、整合、資安、支援、合約條款和參考對象。 ## 輸出 ```markdown ## Vendor Review: [Vendor Name] **Date:** [Date] | **Type:** [New / Renewal / Comparison] ### Summary [2-3 sentence recommendation] ### Cost Analysis | Component | Annual Cost | Notes | |-----------|-------------|-------| | License/subscription | $[X] | [Per seat, flat, usage-based] | | Implementation | $[X] | [One-time] | | Support/maintenance | $[X] | [Included or add-on] | | **Total Year 1** | **$[X]** | | | **Total 3-Year** | **$[X]** | | ### Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-----------|--------|------------| | [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation] | ### Strengths - [Strength 1] - [Strength 2] ### Concerns - [Concern 1] - [Concern 2] ### Recommendation [Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning] ### Negotiation Points - [Leverage point 1] - [Leverage point 2] ``` ## 如果有連接 Connector 如果有連接 **~~knowledge base**： - 搜尋現有的供應商評估、合約和績效審閱 - 拉出採購政策和核准門檻 如果有連接 **~~procurement**： - 拉出目前的合約條款、支出歷史和續約日期 - 把定價跟現有的供應商合約比較 ## 小訣竅 1. **上傳提案**：我可以從供應商文件中抽出定價、條款和 SLA。 2. **比較供應商**：「Compare Vendor A vs Vendor B」可以拿到並排分析。 3. **附上目前的支出**：續約時，知道你現在付多少，有助於評估價格變動。
英文原文
--- name: vendor-review description: Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off. argument-hint: "<vendor name or proposal>" --- # /vendor-review > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Evaluate a vendor with structured analysis covering cost, risk, performance, and fit. ## Usage ``` /vendor-review $ARGUMENTS ``` ## What I Need From You - **Vendor name**: Who are you evaluating? - **Context**: New vendor evaluation, renewal decision, or comparison? - **Details**: Contract terms, pricing, proposal document, or current performance data ## Evaluation Framework ### Cost Analysis (Total Cost of Ownership) - Total cost of ownership (not just license fees) - Implementation and migration costs - Training and onboarding costs - Ongoing support and maintenance - Exit costs (data migration, contract termination) ### Risk Assessment - Vendor financial stability - Security and compliance posture - Concentration risk (single vendor dependency) - Contract lock-in and exit terms - Business continuity and disaster recovery ### Performance Metrics - SLA compliance - Support response times - Uptime and reliability - Feature delivery cadence - Customer satisfaction ### Comparison Matrix When comparing vendors, produce a side-by-side matrix covering: pricing, features, integrations, security, support, contract terms, and references. ## Output ```markdown ## Vendor Review: [Vendor Name] **Date:** [Date] | **Type:** [New / Renewal / Comparison] ### Summary [2-3 sentence recommendation] ### Cost Analysis | Component | Annual Cost | Notes | |-----------|-------------|-------| | License/subscription | $[X] | [Per seat, flat, usage-based] | | Implementation | $[X] | [One-time] | | Support/maintenance | $[X] | [Included or add-on] | | **Total Year 1** | **$[X]** | | | **Total 3-Year** | **$[X]** | | ### Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-----------|--------|------------| | [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation] | ### Strengths - [Strength 1] - [Strength 2] ### Concerns - [Concern 1] - [Concern 2] ### Recommendation [Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning] ### Negotiation Points - [Leverage point 1] - [Leverage point 2] ``` ## If Connectors Available If **~~knowledge base** is connected: - Search for existing vendor evaluations, contracts, and performance reviews - Pull procurement policies and approval thresholds If **~~procurement** is connected: - Pull current contract terms, spend history, and renewal dates - Compare pricing against existing vendor agreements ## Tips 1. **Upload the proposal** — I can extract pricing, terms, and SLAs from vendor documents. 2. **Compare vendors** — "Compare Vendor A vs Vendor B" gets you a side-by-side analysis. 3. **Include current spend** — For renewals, knowing what you pay now helps evaluate price changes.